Not a real adult
Spoiler Warning: This text is about the new Hunger Games movie Mockingjay. It contains spoilers on the story. If you haven't seen it yet, and plan on doing so, your probably shouldn't read on!
Aparently, I'm not a real adult. Because I recently went to the movies to see The Hunger Games: Mockingjay. According to BBC's film critic Owen Gleiberman, I am somehow stuck in my teen, and lack a real perspective on the world. Mostly because I liked the film.
Well, in my view, Gliesman didn't understand the film, or maybe it's because I'm biased, because I read the books first. His major complaint is right at the beginning of his text:
Alma Coin (Julianne Moore), the high-handed leader of the rebellion, and Plutarch (Philip Seymour Hoffman), the movement's jaunty minister of propaganda, explain that the proletarian revolt that Katniss ignited now has the chance to take wing. If she can find it within herself to become the icon of revolution known as ‘The Mockingjay’, then the oppressed districts of the dystopian nation Panem will rise up, join forces, and break the fascist grip of the Capitol. Faced with this offer, Katniss seems neither pleased nor particularly incendiary. Instead, with a look of glazed yearning, she wants to know just one thing: "What about Peeta? Is he alive?"
If you have seen the first two movies, you know that Katniss' relationship to Peeta is not so much defined by yearning, but by mutual dependence. In the second part, Katniss vows that she would keep Peeta alive, no matter the cost. And she doesn't take that vow so much because her romantic feelings towards him, but because it's the only thing that keeps her going.
Katniss is a broken character. She suffers from severe post traumatic stress disorder, and is a mental wreck. One of the defining moments in the films, is when she beds the dead little girl, Rue, onto flowers, to grant her a final moment of dignity. In the films this is depicted as the moment that sparks the revolution. But Katniss is completely unaware of this. She only learns later, that her act has lead to an uprising in Rue's district. In Catching Fire she takes a vow to protect Peeta, for the same reasons: Clining on to her humanity.
The whole twist of the story is that Katniss is not, unlilke Gleiberman suggests, the leader of the revolution. That is what Coin and Plutarch would like her to be. Her concern about Peeta is mainly fueled by her wish not to topple over the edge of sanity.
Yes, The Hunger Games is a young adult novel. And it is for sure not the deepest philosophical work. But to say, as Gleiberman does, it is all about the puppy-love, and put it in the same category as the TwilightTwilight novels, doesn't do it justice either.
So, if you haven't seen it, you should. But make sure you have seen parts one and two first, otherwise the story would not make much sense to you. Or, even better, read the books.
An Edwardian Ghost Story
Description: | Time Travel |
---|---|
Summary: | When Winifred Watson-Armstrong takes a stroll around her father's estate, she meets a stranger. |
Rating: | All Audiences |
License: |
The header image is taken from the Cragside House Blog |
A New Name for an Old Evil
When I browsed trough my Twitter-timeline today, I stumbled on a debate, that has been sparked by Adam Boulton, the political editor at Sky News, who, in a comment on an international conference against sexual violence in war, posted the following statement:
In short: No, Mr. Boulton, it doesn't.
It was the same week, in which the Indian gouvenment minister Babulal Gaur stated, in response to a brutal gang rape and murder of two young girls, that rape was "a social crime, sometimes it's right, sometimes it's wrong".
These events, and the following debate on twitter, prompted broadcaster, author and columnist Caitlin Moran to repost a column she wrote on why she thinks rape and other forms of sexual violence should be re-labled.
Moran realises, that the main problem, which makes dealing with sexual crime so difficult, is our ambiguous relationship with sex. Since it is so loaded with emotion, morals and religion, she argues, it's hard to deal with it, so we should start treating sexual violence like we percieve any other sort of physical assult.
The original column was written in the aftermath of the brutal gang rape in a New Dehli bus in which a young woman was literally raped to death. Moran agrues, that in this case, the focus should be put on the brutal violence, not on the fact that it was sexually motivated. From this observation, she draws the conclusion, that rape, as a violent crime, should not be treated any different from other forms of violence to put an end to the victim blaming.
I disagree. We cannot treat sexual violence the same way we treat a non-sexual violence. Just because it isn't the same. In many aspects it's worse. Let's face it, cases like the one in Dehli that display such a shocking amount of physical violence are rare. More often than not the physical injuries are lesser than, say on those who fell victim to domestic violence and are beaten up. And yet, do we really need to argue that a rape would be a lesser crime, when the victim wasn't ripped apart? As most rape survivors will tell you the psychological injuries outweigh the physical. Of course every form of abuse also attacks the psyche, but only few forms of violence are so damaging. And the reason for that has everything to do with sex!
Our sexuality is, like almost everything else we do, a form of communication. Even more, it is mostly a form of communication. The procreational aspect is just a minor side effect (really, when was the last time you got between the sheets with someone, for the sole purpose of making a baby?). Sexuality can be used to strengthen the bond between couples, to show outsiders, that there is no way for them to get between two (or more) people who love each other.
It can be used to influence peoples opionons or preferences, to get an advantage or it can just be fun.
But like every form of communication, it also has a dark side. In case of humans, sexuality is also a behaviour of dominance. Many primates, such as chimps, use sexual behaviour to define their place in the group and rape is not uncommon among these creatures. In many aspects, we're not so different from them. Every human in the world will understand the gesture of the erect middle finger. And virtually everyone will feel insulted, when it's directed towards them.
It's meaning is clear: It means "I fuck you!", or translated, "I consider myself higher ranking than you!". Rape is the ultimate and darkest way of communicating that message. Almost never is it done for sexual pleasure, and it's always seen as a demonstration of power. This is where its descructive force originates from. It can destroy the self-conciousness of the victim by directly attacking the victims self-perception, and her status in society. In that sense it is an attack directed at the victims humanity itself.
Sexuality is an ancient form of communication, we inherited it from the common ancestors we share with the great apes. It outdates spoken language and most likely the parts of our brains, where reason and logic are located. Consequently, our initial response to sexual violence is gouverned by the more pimordial regions of our brains, often inducing feelings of shame and guilt in the victim, as irrational as this may seem to the mind, as well as uneasyness or fear in others. I my opinion, this is the source of all sorts of bad things from misogyny to homophobia, it is all driven by this ancient mechanism.
This also sheds a different light on people like Babulal Gaur. His reaction to the crime, siding with the perpetrator rather than with the victims, turns out to be an act of cowardice. He doesn't want to be associated with the victims, even distance himself from them, because unconsciously he's afraid he might be seen as one of them by others if he gets too close, and then he might have to fight in order to keep his place in the pecking order.
Our feelings about sexualitly and sexual violence may be hard-wired, but as humans it is up to us what we make of them. We could, of course, follow Caitlin Morans advice, and try to ignore the sexual components in acts of violence. In other cases it might even work, because the language we use influences our way of thinking. But in this case, in my opinion, it would be in vain, since the part of the brain we need to address knows nothing about words, and therefore is immune to them.
Or else we could try to shine the light of reason onto our sexuality and its links with violence and try to understand what drives us. Maybe we find out that everything I wrote here is wrong, and the truth is entirely different. But whatever it is we find, understanding it is the key to overcoming it. We can then give ourselves social rules, that allow us to ostracise the rapists instead of the victims, and we could teach our children, that the first impulse you have when you hear of something like rape, often belies reality.
It's not the easiest path to walk, because we might find that there is a little hairy monkey inside all of us, that wants to prey on the weak and throw stones at abused women. And all our reason will not be able to make the it go away.
But however hard it may be, we should face that monkey and put it in its place. Otherwise we'll end up letting it loose again and again.
In the meantime we can begin by calling the apologists of rape culture what they are: cowards.
Want To Do Some Good?
I think I have been writing about Zoë Keating before. If not here, then on Twitter. I have been listening to her music ever since she played second chair in Rasputina, and she has been my favourite artist ever since.
If you don't know her, Zoë is a one woman orchestra. By using sampling and looping technologies, she creates complex and inticrate music with just one cello. All live and in real time.
This is how she sounds like:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G96AMzt1xJQ
Lately she had to deal with some really serious blows, when her husband was diagnosed with stage IV cancer, and she even had to deal with her insurance company, because they initially wrote that they denied her claim for the lack of medical neccessety for the treatment her husband received. Weird standards, considered that they just saved the husbands life in the clinic.
Anyway, Zoë has a small child at home, and the family makes a living from her work as an artist. For obvious reasons, the planned tour and new album are put on halt for now, and it's not clear yet, if the insurance company won't attempt playing another dirty trick to avoid paying.
Therefore, Zoë has asked her fans for their support. How you can do that?
You can go to her Website and click on the donate button, or -even better- you can buy her music. In that case, you can choose to pay more than the price tag. You won't regret it!
I wish all the best to Zoë and her family, and keep my fingers crossed for a quick recovery.